An appendix presents significant state Supreme Court rulings that have struck down or upheld the existing school finance system.May 17, 1954, marks a defining moment in the history of the United States. Winston) notes the presidency's limits in addressing the problem. "Educational Equity and the President's Initiative on Race" (Judith A. "Electoral Politics and School Finance Reform" (Jeffrey Henig) examines the state electoral considerations that affect educational equity.
Reed) discusses the trajectory from school desegregation lawsuits to school finance lawsuits, suggesting that school finance suits generally make a difference. "State Courts and Educational Finance" (Douglas S. Reed) maintains that the levels of racial oppression and racial conflict were altered by the decision, though it did not create a more equal educational system. Board" (Roger Wilkins) suggests that the case changed the expectations of black Americans in ways that ultimately had profound consequences for the nation. Patterson) highlights the impact of the case on the civil rights movement and school integration or desegregation and educational quality, asserting ambivalence about the role of Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy" (James T.
These papers are based on a 2002 seminar that examined the book "Brown v.
0 kommentar(er)
